Research

Work in Progress

My first book, Power Lines: Electricity in American Life and Letters, 1882-1952, claims that the idea of technological progress impeded social and humanistic development. It demonstrates that many Americans invested in the belief that new devices would eventually improve democracy and equality, despite ample evidence to the contrary—including, most notably, the horrific mistreatment of women, African Americans, and other minorities. Power Lines suggests that literature raised important questions about this harmful faith in technological solutions. Concomitantly, it argues (among other things) that literary history must be studied with technological history if we aspire to understand both our technological culture and the alternative ways it could have evolved—and could still evolve. My second book project, The Literary and Technological Imaginaries of the American Prison, examines a similar phenomenon within a more narrow and urgent context: it argues that American prisons have invested in technological solutions to social problems, which could better be addressed by humanistic and sociological interventions.

If you would like to see the full book abstract, including chapter descriptions, I am happy to share that information via email at j.lieberman at unf dot edu.

First Book (Now Available)

Power Lines: Electricity, Literature, and the American Network, 1882-1952, MIT Press, 2017.

At the turn of the twentieth century, electricity emerged as a metaphor for modernity. Writers from Mark Twain to Ralph Ellison grappled with the idea of electricity as both life force (illumination) and death spark (electrocution). The idea that electrification created exclusively modern experiences took hold of Americans’ imaginations, whether they welcomed or feared its adoption. In Power Lines, Jennifer Lieberman examines the apparently incompatible notions of electricity that coexisted in the American imagination, tracing how electricity became a common (though multifarious) symbol for modern life.

Lieberman examines a series of moments of technical change when electricity accrued new social meanings, plotting both power lines and the power of narrative lines in American life and literature. While discussing the social construction of electrical systems, she offers a new interpretation of Twain’s use of electricity as an organizing metaphor in A Connecticut Yankee in King Arthur’s Court, describes the rhetoric surrounding the invention of electric execution, analyzes Charlotte Perkins Gilman’s call for human connection in her utopian writing and in her little-known Human Work, considers the theme of electrical interconnection in Jack London’s work, and shows how Ralph Ellison and Louis Mumford continued the literary tradition of electrical metaphor.

Electrical power was a distinctive concept in American literary, cultural, and technological histories. For this reason, narratives about electricity were particularly evocative. Bridging the realistic and the romantic, the historical and the fantastic, these stories guide us to ask new questions about our enduring fascination with electricity and all it came to represent.

Endorsements for Power Lines

Power Lines provides a fascinating study of how electricity defined modernity in American fiction from 1880 to 1950. In this model interdisciplinary work, Jennifer Lieberman demonstrates how authors define technologies through a provocative communicative process that continues long after the initial act of invention.”
David E. Nye, author of Electrifying America

“In this innovative, insightful, and lucid new book, Jennifer Lieberman reframes our understanding of electricity’s symbolic and cultural meanings at the end of the nineteenth century and the early part of the twentieth century. Power Lines conducts us through an ambitious retelling of the cultural and technological development of electricity, enlightening readers about how electricity’s symbolic potential both obscured and revealed its imbrication in socioeconomic networks of power and revealing the undeveloped, alternative paths still possibly available for imagining and using technology in more progressive ways.”
Paul Gilmore, Rutgers University, author of Aesthetic Materialism: Electricity and American Romanticism

Additional Research

In general, I research the intersections between literary and technological history. I am particularly interested in why we try to understand ourselves by drawing analogies to technology. We tell stories about human exceptionalism, which insist that we are irreducible to the artifacts we create. And yet, (as Martin Heidegger predicted in his Question Concerning Technology,) we also describe ourselves–our minds and our bodies–in metaphors we draw from our most up-to-date inventions. I approach these questions from multiple vantage points, initiating and extending conversations between Science and Technology Studies and American literary studies. My forthcoming book project illustrates one such approach to these issues. As mentioned above, I would be happy to discuss such works in progress via email.

In addition to her book, my recent work can be found in JLS (2017),  Configurations (with Ronald Kline, 2017), History and Technology (2016), The Eaton Journal of Archival Science Fiction (2016), MELUS: Multi-Ethnic Literature in the US (2015), The Mark Twain Annual (2010) and in the collection of original work, Demands of the Dead: Executions, Storytelling, and Activism (University of Iowa, 2012). I also have a piece forthcoming in Studies in the Novel (2017). You can listen to an interview about my work on the “Cultures of Energy” podcast, or find it mentioned in Michael Lindgren’s essay, “The Miseducation of Henry Adams” or in Cori Brosnahan’s article “Tesla’s Dinner Party,” which accompanies PBS’ American Experience documentary about Tesla.